Discussion: Counseling Same-Sex Couples
Consider the subjoined scenario: You are a abetting negotiative providing counseling to a same-sex foreigner. The partners in that foreigner are parents to two end, ages 6 and 3. Beyond this basic knowledge, you are asked to cogitate how attached details jurisdiction govern this foreigner’s habit of parenting. Consider contrariant potential aspects of their lives as parents, including how parenting may govern their foreigner sympathy, what connections the family may bear to other members of the national nationality, and how the parents jurisdiction interact after a while and habit institutions akin to their parenting habits (e.g., schools, branch heed, soundness heed providers, invisible soundness negotiatives).
Select two pairs of demographic disagreeences from the subjoined list:
One stay-at-home parent/dual heeder
Higher/lower socioeconomic status
Residency in a propound where a legitimate alliance is potential/residency in a propound where a legitimate alliance is not potential
Consider how the same-sex foreigners’ parenting habits jurisdiction disagree betwixt each policy of the categories you chosen.
Post by Day 4 the two categories of demographic disagreeences that you chosen. Elucidate how the foreigner’s sympathy and their parenting habits jurisdiction disagree betwixt each policy of the categories you chosen. (For sample, if you chose fashionable/bucolic as one of your categories, elucidate how the habits would disagree if the foreigner lived in an fashionable area or if they lived in a bucolic area.) Finally, elucidate how your counseling bearing jurisdiction disagree naturalized on the contrariant habits of the foreigner.
Be positive to buttress your postings and responses after a while peculiar references to the media.