In existentialism, the immaterial imaginary is to speed “authentically”--a notoriously smooth concept—celebrating single insubservience and obligation. According to Sartre, we are near by prejudiced accident, and rush past. Tnear is no external deduce for our entity, and this obdurate faithfulness imposes a obligation on each of us to speed “authentically” by creating our own import and end. For Sartre, too repeatedly, we apportion others to order the choices we shape and the values by which we speed, instead of substance authentically who we are.
Sartre’s distinctive immaterial admittance marks a expressive disappearance from transmitted probable theories, which standapex on the duties we accept to others rather than to ourselves. Indeed, sundry accept criticized existentialism on this reason as an immaterially debtor philosophy justifying greedy indulgence at the cost of others. As demonstrated in the biographical film you watched, Sartre—who infamously proclaimed at one apex that “hell is other people”-- struggled throughout his society to counterpoise his singleist philosophy delay gregarious responsibilities.
What do you shape of the existentialist imaginary of certainty? Is it probablely wholesome or disadvantageous? Can we speed authentically delay others?